Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Tanny's avatar

In his article listed above, Simon Shuster discusses possible end games for the war in Ukraine.

As is typical for most commentators on the subject, the article focuses excessively on Trump, with no mention of the EU. If I understand correctly (correct me if I don't) the EU has something like 4,000 tanks which are sitting on EU soil gathering dust while truly heroic Ukrainians die daily in the defense of Europe. No commentator I've been able to find seems to have the slightest interest in asking what constructive purpose EU tanks are serving parked in their home countries.

Dear journalists and experts, please do tell us, what is the EU's plan anyway? Is it to pray that the Ukrainians bleed the Russians in to submission so the EU won't have to do anything other than issue press releases? If that's the plan, what happens if it fails? What will the EU do if Ukraine falls and Russian troops wind up on the Polish border freshly rearmed with confiscated Ukrainian weapons? What then EU? Should that happen won't the EU then desperately wish that it had joined the fight in Ukraine along side of Europe's largest army and it's most capable and experienced warriors?

As is typical for most commentators on the subject, Shuster's article focuses excessively on Trump, with no mention of China. Yes, it's true, really it is, China still exists! And it's the primary reason why America needs to disentangle itself from European and MidEast wars. But to read the "expert" press this has nothing to do with Ukraine, and the only thing in the entire universe which matters is Trump, Trump, Trump.

Expand full comment

No posts